Winkelhof revisited (in the Supreme Court)

30 May 2014
shutterstock 326434361

… most LLP members are entitled to a number of rights and protections …

The Supreme Court has handed down judgment in favour of Ms van Winkelhof in the case of Clyde & Co LLP v Bates van Winkelhof, finding that she was a “worker” within the meaning of section 230(3) of the Employment Rights Act 1996.

The basis for the decision is that Ms van Winkelhof could not market her services as a solicitor to anyone other than the LLP and was an integral part of their business. The LLP could not be said to be her client or customer.

This decision means that most LLP members are entitled to a number of rights and protections including the right to auto-enrolment in a qualifying pension scheme, whistleblower protection, paid holiday, the right not be treated less favourably if working part-time, protection under the Working Time Regulations and the right to receive the Minimum Wage.

Articles on this website are for discussion purposes only and are not intended to be and should not be relied upon as legal or other advice or for any other purpose. Unless indicated otherwise the law discussed in this website is the law of England and Wales. Law, practice and opinions change over time and the matters discussed should not be assumed to be up to date. I disclaim all liability and responsibility for updating content. See the full terms of use of this website here.

Related posts